Home › Rasmussen University-Wisconsin › Information Science

Information Science at Rasmussen University-Wisconsin

Green Bay, WI · Private for-profit · Bachelor's Degree · Information Science/Studies
66 /100
DegreeOutlook Score (Base Case)
67
Optimistic
66
Base Case
59
Pessimistic
Earnings $64,329/yr (8% vs median)
AI Risk Very High (68% exposed)
Job Market Very Large (221,900 openings/yr)
ROI 13.7x earnings multiple
Ranked #85 of 129 Information Science/Studies programs

How AI Changes the Outlook

Three scenarios based on how aggressively AI disrupts the career paths available to Information Science graduates.

Optimistic
No Disruption		 Base Case
Gradual AI		 Pessimistic
Aggressive AI
10-Year Earnings $674K $659K $561K
Earnings Multiple 14.1x 13.7x 11.7x
Probability of Field Employment 74% 68% 39%
DegreeOutlook Score 67 66 59

10-Year Earnings Projection

*Year 1 uses actual reported earnings. Scenarios diverge as AI impact compounds over time.

4-Year Tuition (Sticker)
$47,928
Median Debt at Graduation
$16,233
3.0 months of Year 1 earnings

Program Analysis

Rasmussen University-Wisconsin's Information Science graduates start at $64,329/yr — above the $59,433 national average, though not by a wide margin.

The 13.7x earnings multiple means ten-year projected earnings exceed tuition cost by an order of magnitude. By pure financial math, this is a standout.

AI risk is moderate — 68% task exposure — and the 17% scenario spread suggests disruption would dent but not destroy the earnings outlook.

Loan repayment is a non-issue here — $16,233 in median debt clears quickly against $64,329 in annual earnings.

At #85 out of 129 programs, Rasmussen University-Wisconsin's financial outcomes for Information Science trail the majority of peers. The value case depends on other factors.

About Rasmussen University-Wisconsin

a smaller institution with 154 students in Green Bay, WI. With 57% of students on Pell Grants, the campus draws from a broad economic spectrum.

See all programs and financial aid at Rasmussen University-Wisconsin →

Top Career Paths

Computer and information systems managers $171,200/yr
Computer and information research scientists $140,910/yr
Database architects $135,980/yr
View all 7 career paths with salary ranges and AI risk →

Compare & Explore

Compare this program → View all 129 schools offering Information Science →

Information Science at Other Schools

Northwestern University ($102,998) Norwich University ($98,551) Excelsior University ($88,713) University of Michigan-Ann Arbor ($88,515) Boston College ($80,731) Albright College ($80,329) James Madison University ($80,173) Utah Valley University ($79,918)

Other Majors at Rasmussen University-Wisconsin

Registered Nursing, Nursing Administration, Nursing Research and Clinical Nursing ($74,861) Business Administration, Management and Operations ($59,693) Computer/Information Technology Administration and Management ($59,685) Human Resources Management and Services ($56,465) Computer Science ($53,832) Accounting and Related Services ($53,285) Finance and Financial Management Services ($47,744) Health and Medical Administrative Services ($46,361)

Is a Trade Program a Better Fit?

Compare Information Science trade programs on TradeSchoolWorth →

For students who prefer applied learning, trade programs can deliver strong earnings with significantly less debt and shorter time to employment.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does Rasmussen University-Wisconsin's Information Science program score?
A score of 66/100 reflects decent absolute metrics, but Rasmussen University-Wisconsin trails the majority of Information Science programs on relative rankings. Context matters more than the raw number.
How vulnerable is Information Science to AI automation?
AI won't 'replace' Information Science careers outright, but it is likely to reduce the number of job openings. We model 68% task exposure, which compresses field employment probability in our scenarios.
Scores use College Scorecard earnings, BLS employment projections, and AI task-exposure research. See full methodology →