Home › University of Mississippi › Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Services

Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Services at University of Mississippi

University, MS · Public · Bachelor's Degree

DegreeOutlook Score (Base Case) — assumes in-state tuition

Optimistic

Base Case

Pessimistic

Earnings $22,275/yr (-35% vs median)

AI Risk High (55% exposed)

Job Market Medium (10,200 openings/yr)

ROI 10.2x earnings multiple (3.6x out-of-state)

Ranked #37 of 37 Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Services programs

How AI Changes the Outlook

Three scenarios based on how aggressively AI disrupts the career paths available to Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Services graduates.

	Optimistic No Disruption	Base Case Gradual AI	Pessimistic Aggressive AI
10-Year Earnings	$371K	$385K	$386K
Earnings Multiple (In-State)	9.8x	10.2x	10.3x
Earnings Multiple (Out-of-State)	3.4x	3.6x	3.6x
Probability of Field Employment	51%	45%	32%
DegreeOutlook Score	20	19	18

10-Year Earnings Projection

*Year 1 uses actual reported earnings. Scenarios diverge as AI impact compounds over time.

4-Year Tuition, In-State (Sticker)

$37,648

Out-of-state: $107,920 (3.6x ROI)

4-Year Net Price (After Aid)

$52,656

-40% less than sticker · See by income

Median Debt at Graduation

$22,500

12.1 months of Year 1 earnings

Program Analysis

University of Mississippi's Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Services graduates start at $22,275/yr, trailing the $34,209 national average by 35%. The program's value hinges on affordability.

The 10.2x earnings multiple means ten-year projected earnings exceed tuition cost by an order of magnitude. By pure financial math, this is a standout.

AI risk is moderate — 55% task exposure — and the -4% scenario spread suggests disruption would dent but not destroy the earnings outlook.

The $22,500 debt load exceeds a year of the $22,275 starting salary, suggesting a multi-year repayment window before graduates break even financially.

At #37 out of 37 programs, University of Mississippi's financial outcomes for Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Services trail the majority of peers. The value case depends on other factors.

About University of Mississippi

A 98% acceptance rate means University of Mississippi is accessible to most applicants, enrolling 18,995 students in University, MS.

See all programs and financial aid at University of Mississippi →

Top Career Paths

Dietitians and nutritionists $73,850/yr

Dietetic technicians $37,040/yr

View all 2 career paths with salary ranges and AI risk →

Compare & Explore

Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Services at Other Schools

Other Majors at University of Mississippi

Is a Trade Program a Better Fit?

For students who prefer applied learning, trade programs can deliver strong earnings with significantly less debt and shorter time to employment.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does University of Mississippi's Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Services program score?

This program scores 19/100 — on the lower end for Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Services. Prospective students should carefully weigh costs against likely earnings.

Do University of Mississippi Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Services graduates earn enough to justify the loans?

The debt-to-income ratio of 1.0x suggests an extended repayment window. Whether it's 'worth it' depends on career trajectory, not just first-year pay.

How vulnerable is Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Services to AI automation?

AI won't 'replace' Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Services careers outright, but it is likely to reduce the number of job openings. We model 55% task exposure, which compresses field employment probability in our scenarios.

Why are Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Services earnings lower at University of Mississippi?

Lower starting pay at University of Mississippi may reflect local labor market conditions rather than program quality. Many graduates see convergence with national averages within 3-5 years.

Scores use College Scorecard earnings, BLS employment projections, and AI task-exposure research. See full methodology →