Construction Engineering Technologies at Georgia Southern University

Statesboro, GA · Public · Bachelor's Degree
71 /100
DegreeOutlook Score (Base Case) — assumes in-state tuition
72
Optimistic
71
Base Case
67
Pessimistic
Earnings $67,235/yr (-6% vs median)
AI Risk Very High (51% exposed)
Job Market Large (69,200 openings/yr)
ROI 33.6x earnings multiple (11.7x out-of-state)
Ranked #8 of 45 Construction Engineering Technologies programs Top 25%

How AI Changes the Outlook

Three scenarios based on how aggressively AI disrupts the career paths available to Construction Engineering Technologies graduates.

Optimistic
No Disruption
Base Case
Gradual AI
Pessimistic
Aggressive AI
10-Year Earnings $837K $794K $686K
Earnings Multiple (In-State) 35.4x 33.6x 29.0x
Earnings Multiple (Out-of-State) 12.3x 11.7x 10.1x
Probability of Field Employment 55% 48% 36%
DegreeOutlook Score 72 71 67

10-Year Earnings Projection

*Year 1 uses actual reported earnings. Scenarios diverge as AI impact compounds over time.

4-Year Tuition, In-State (Sticker)
$23,620
Out-of-state: $67,836 (11.7x ROI)
4-Year Net Price (After Aid)
$66,124
-180% less than sticker · See by income
Median Debt at Graduation
$24,225
4.3 months of Year 1 earnings
Reported Earnings (5 Year)
$101,493
51% growth from Year 1

Program Analysis

Georgia Southern University's Construction Engineering Technologies program produces graduates earning $67,235/yr — within striking distance of the $71,754 national average for this field.

Every dollar of in-state tuition returns an estimated 33.6x in decade earnings — an exceptional ratio that places this among the highest-ROI Construction Engineering Technologies programs nationally.

Some AI exposure exists in Construction Engineering Technologies's typical career paths, with 51% of job tasks potentially affected. The pessimistic scenario still projects solid returns, with a 18% gap from the optimistic case.

Loan repayment is a non-issue here — $24,225 in median debt clears quickly against $67,235 in annual earnings.

At #8 of 45 nationally, this is a top-5% Construction Engineering Technologies program. Financial outcomes consistently outperform the vast majority of peers.

Five-year earnings of $101,493 show a 51% jump from the $67,235 starting point — strong upward trajectory suggesting real career acceleration.

About Georgia Southern University

A 90% acceptance rate means Georgia Southern University is accessible to most applicants, serving a student body of 21,029 in Statesboro, GA.

See all programs and financial aid at Georgia Southern University →

Top Career Paths

Construction managers $106,980/yr
Cost estimators $77,070/yr
Civil engineering technologists and technicians $64,200/yr
View all 3 career paths with salary ranges and AI risk →

Compare & Explore

Construction Engineering Technologies at Other Schools

Other Majors at Georgia Southern University

Is a Trade Program a Better Fit?

For students who prefer applied learning, trade programs can deliver strong earnings with significantly less debt and shorter time to employment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the DegreeOutlook Score for Construction Engineering Technologies at Georgia Southern University?
This program scores 71/100 — placing it among the stronger programs for Construction Engineering Technologies nationally. The score reflects above-average earnings, manageable AI risk, and solid financial return.
Will AI replace Construction Engineering Technologies careers?
With 51% of typical job tasks exposed to AI, this is one of the higher-risk fields. Our pessimistic scenario projects $686,134 in decade earnings vs $836,709 in the optimistic case — a meaningful gap.
What makes Georgia Southern University's Construction Engineering Technologies program stand out?
Ranked #8 of 45 programs nationally, Georgia Southern University lands in the top 25%. The ranking reflects a combination of graduate earnings, return on investment, and job market alignment.
Scores use College Scorecard earnings, BLS employment projections, and AI task-exposure research. See full methodology →