Dance at Chapman University
Orange, CA · Private nonprofit · Bachelor's Degree
DegreeOutlook Score (Base Case)
10
Optimistic
9
Base Case
6
Pessimistic
Earnings
$21,275/yr (-5% vs median)
AI Risk
Low (24% exposed)
Job Market
Medium (11,500 openings/yr)
ROI
1.8x earnings multiple
How AI Changes the Outlook
Three scenarios based on how aggressively AI disrupts the career paths available to Dance graduates.
| Optimistic No Disruption |
Base Case Gradual AI |
Pessimistic Aggressive AI |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 10-Year Earnings | $448K | $449K | $424K |
| Earnings Multiple | 1.8x | 1.8x | 1.7x |
| Probability of Field Employment | 36% | 35% | 30% |
| DegreeOutlook Score | 10 | 9 | 6 |
10-Year Earnings Projection
*Year 1 uses actual reported earnings. Scenarios diverge as AI impact compounds over time.
4-Year Tuition (Sticker)
$251,136
Median Debt at Graduation
$23,624
13.3 months of Year 1 earnings
Reported Earnings (5 Year)
$33,077
55% growth from Year 1
About Chapman University
Chapman University's 56% acceptance rate reflects moderate selectivity, enrolling 7,629 students in Orange, CA.
See all programs and financial aid at Chapman University →Top Career Paths
Art, drama, and music teachers, postsecondary
$80,190/yr
Choreographers
$55,600/yr
Dancers
N/A
Compare & Explore
Dance at Other Schools
Other Majors at Chapman University
Consider the Trade Route?
Trade programs often mean less time in school, lower student debt, and hands-on career paths that tend to be more resilient to AI disruption.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does Chapman University's Dance program score?
This program scores 9/100 — on the lower end for Dance. Prospective students should carefully weigh costs against likely earnings.
Do Chapman University Dance graduates earn enough to justify the loans?
The debt-to-income ratio of 1.1x suggests an extended repayment window. Whether it's 'worth it' depends on career trajectory, not just first-year pay.
Scores use College Scorecard earnings, BLS employment projections, and AI task-exposure research.
See full methodology →